News Archives: Tagged Corporations

Corporations Evade At Least $400 Billion A Year In Taxes — 4 Times The Size Of The Sequester   

You pay your taxes, so why don’t corporations?

The sequester continues to harm important investments in America, with the latest casualty being the National Park Service — which may have to shed employees and deny park visits which would mean losing 267,000 visitors.

But as average Americans feel the pain of $85 billion of annual cuts, corporations continue to rip off the Treasury.

Recall this July 2011 report from the Center for American Progress. Drawing on Internal Revenue Service data, it estimates that corporations underpay their taxes — either through evasion or noncompliance — by $400 to $500 billion every single year. So that means at the very least that corporations are dodging taxes that are equal to four times the amount that the sequester is cutting.

Some in Congress want to replace the sequester with a deal that cuts Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid benefits. Click here to sign on as a citizen sponsor of the Grayson-Takano letter against Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefit cuts.

You should follow BoldProgressives on Twitter here.


Posted on March 11, 2013 at 12:06pm by . Posted in , , . 1 comment. Leave a response.

Abraham Lincoln Anticipated And Fought Against The Rise Of Big Business And Income Inequality   

Stephen Spielberg’s Lincoln is a hit at the box office, and it is widely anticipated to be a strong contender at this year’s Oscars.

The film focuses mostly on Lincoln’s most famous feat: re-uniting a nation that had been through a civil war and ending the abomination of slavery.

But as moviegoers enjoy this Lincoln biopic, they should remember one other important detail about Lincoln’s career: his struggle to stop big corporations from taking over the American economy and the resulting skyrocketing of economic inequality.
Here’s an except from a letter Lincoln wrote to Col. William F. Elkins November 1st, 1864. In it, Lincoln warns of the dangers of allowing all of the nation’s wealth to be “aggregated in a few hands”:

I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.

Indeed, in his December 3rd, 1861 address to Congress, Lincoln warned of how the growing business class must respect its workers:

Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights. Nor is it denied that there is, and probably always will be, a relation between labor and capital, producing mutual benefits. The error is in assuming that the whole labor of the community exists within that relation.

The former president also was distrustful of the rise of modern capitalism that would subvert workers’ wills to employers. He challenged the notion that Americans should be expected to work for corporations or private employers rather than work independently. He praised “men, with their families — wives, sons, and daughters — [who] work for themselves, on their farms, in their houses, and in their shops, taking the whole product to themselves, and asking no favors of capital on the one hand, nor of hirelings or slaves on the other.”

Keep in mind that Lincoln did serve as a lawyer for many of the big railroad companies at the time, and they did consider him a friend while he served in office. But he frequently challenged corporate wealth in the nation, particularly the banks. In 1838, while serving in the Illinois legislature, he called for an audit of the Second Bank of the United States, the equivalent of the Federal Reserve. He even offered an amendment that would’ve revoked its charter if it did not share its records with the Illinois Assembly.

Lincoln is a giant among American historical figures, and his leadership changed the very trajectory of our nation’s history. Progressives should take the renewed interest in this former president to educate Americans about his beliefs about the necessity of economic justice.


Posted on November 26, 2012 at 11:43am by . Posted in , . Leave a response.

The Real Free Loaders: 5 Corporations That Paid A Zero Percent Income Tax Rate (Or Less!)   

A picture from a British demonstration against tax dodging. (Photo credit: Flickr user Dominic’s pics.)

Mitt Romney’s offensive comments at a recent fundraiser that demeaned Americans who are too old or too poor to be asked to pay federal income taxes have set off a debate about economic fairness.

Yesterday, we showed you how Republicans support using the government to funnel tax dollars to the very rich.

Here’s another outrage. There are many massive corporations that get away with paying zero percent tax rates — or less (meaning they got tax benefits). Here’s just five that have gotten away with doing this in recent years:

  1. Boeing: The massive airline producer and weapons company is one of the worst freeloaders. From 2002 to 2011, it paid nothing in federal corporate income taxes. In fact, it even reported more than $2 billion in federal tax benefits over that period of time. This doesn’t even mention the billions of dollars Boeing gets from the Import-Export bank or the military budget.
  2. Wells Fargo: From 2008 to 2010, this megabank actually got away with paying a net tax rate of negative 1.4 percent.
  3. Verizon: This telecommunications corporation paid a negative 2.9 percent tax rate between 2008 and 2010. At the same time, it made nearly $32 billion in profits. It likely took some of that money to use for union-busting in the coming years.
  4. Pepco: This corporation paid a -57.6 percent income tax rate from 2008 to 2010 while at the same time accumulating $882 million in profits. That’s news that’s sure to make their customers — who have suffered from subpar service for years — groan.
  5. Bank of America: Bank of America didn’t pay a penny in federal income taxes in 2010, but it did report a tax benefit of almost a billion dollars.

How is it that massive corporations are able to get away with paying less in taxes than most middle-class Americans? They have massive armies of lobbyists and public relations gurus, and they’re able to flood campaign coffers with a nearly unlimited amount of money. That results in a tax code full of loopholes and unfair credits and deductions.

Romney’s right that we should be angry about people taking advantage of the government and taxpayer. But for the most part, those people aren’t poor and working-class Americans. They’re powerful corporations, the very same ones that Romney has failed to hold accountable.


Posted on September 19, 2012 at 10:21am by . Posted in , , . 10 comments. Leave a response.

How Corporations Are Influencing The Democratic National Convention   

Tony Podesta, one of Democratic Washington’s most powerful corporate lobbyists, is in Charlotte this week to cozy up to politicians.

Last week’s Republican National Convention was a no-holds-barred party for lobbyists for Big Business. From free espresso from fracking lobbyists to nightly parties with Coca Cola and weapons lobbyists, Big Money had a great time at the convention last week.

But these corporations aren’t exactly sitting on the sidelines at the Democratic convention this week.

It’s true that the host committee for the convention took an historic and important step of for the first time ever refusing to take any donations from lobbyists or corporations.

But that isn’t stopping Big Business. Here’s a few ways it has found to influence the convention, anyway:

  • Hosting Watch Events Outside The Convention: The America Petroleum Institute, American Gas Association, Credit Union National Association, Pfizer, and others will be hosting watch parties around a mile away from Bank of America stadium.
  • Sponsorships: The Washington Examiner’s Tim Carney shows off a swag bag that the host committee is giving to journalists. Inside the bag are all sorts of goodies that sponsors of the convention are giving away. These include a pedometer from United Health Group and water bottles from Piedmont Natural Gas. Carney notes that corporations like Wells Fargo and Florida Crystals Corporation (which is a major force of the sugar lobby) are on the sponsor list as well. Duke Energy, notorious for battling any effort to curb climate change, extended a $10 million line of credit for the party to hold the convention, and its CEO has given $100,000 to the host committee.
  • Parties, Parties, And More Parties: Elite lobbyists have been setting up all sorts of events for lawmakers to be wined and dined. The New York Times has a write-up of one Charlotte event featuring Tony and Heather Podesta, two of the most well-connected Democratic Party lobbyists. The Podesta’s event on Monday hosted executives from Wal-Mart, Blue Shield and others while also hosting politicos such as Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. In addition to bringing together corporate executives and politicians, the Podestas brought all sorts of food, everything from “bite-size biscuit-and-country-ham sandwiches, deviled eggs with pickled okra, duck and corn quesadillas, and bourbon molasses truffles.”

The Democrats will boast of sticking up for the little guy and taking on Big Business during their convention speeches this week. And by most measures, they do accomplish these tasks far better than the opposition party. But as the lavish events hosted by lobbyists and corporations right outside the convention walls (and in the swag bags) show, corporations still have far too much influence in even the Democratic Party.


Posted on September 4, 2012 at 11:00am by . Posted in , . 6 comments. Leave a response.

PR WATCH: PCCC Pressures Democratic Members to Drop ALEC   

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), an online activist group, announced that they will be putting pressure on the minority of Democrats who are members of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to dump ALEC. PCCC held a phone call on April 20 to launch the effort, and Wisconsin state Senator Chris Larson spoke about the harm that ALEC legislation has caused in Wisconsin. [more]


Posted on April 23, 2012 at 3:00pm by . Posted in , , , , . Leave a response.